In my opinion, Facebook realizes that people don’t like to be tracked, and that targeted ads can be creepy. This has nothing to do with an attempt to help small businesses. Facebook is worried that Apple’s AppTrackingTransparency feature will hurt Facebook’s chance to make money off the data it collects from its users. Personally, I think EFF did an excellent job of explaining why Facebook’s “laughable” campaign is a problem. Because the ad industry has promoted this fantasy that targeted advertising is superior to other methods of reaching customers, anything else will inherently command less value on ad markets, EFF reported. The rest goes to third-party data brokers who keep the lights on by exploiting your information, and not to small businesses trying to work within a broken system to reach their customers.ĮFF pointed out that small businesses cannot compete with large ad distribution networks on their own. Facebook’s complaint, according to EFF, is what Facebook stands to lose if its users learn more about exactly what it and other data brokers are up to behind the scenes.īottom line: “The Association of National Advertisers estimates that, when the “ad tech tax” is taken into account, publishers are only taking home between 30 and 40 cents of every dollar ”. The EFF described Facebook’s campaign as “laughable”.įacebook claimed that Apple’s new AppTrackingTransparancy for iOS 14, iPadOS 14, and tvOS 14 “will hurt small businesses who benefit from access to targeted advertising services.” EFF points out that Facebook is not telling you the whole story. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has shared its opinion about Facebook’s full-page newspaper ad campaign against Apple’s AppTrackingTransparency feature on iPhones. EFF Calls Facebook’s Campaign Against Apple “Laughable” I think that digital privacy is a topic we can all agree needs to be made more secure. Nobody wants data brokers to sell their information. Personally, I don’t think anyone wants to have their data collected by big tech companies – no matter what it was they were looking at on their phone or computer.
Wade, saying that women “seeking abortions and other reproductive healthcare will become particularly vulnerable to privacy harms, including through the collection of their location data,” The letter cited the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. The letters came in the wake of Politico’s reporting on a leaked draft decision that would cut back the protections.ĪrsTechnica reported that four Democratic US Senators asked the Federal Trade Commission to “investigate Apple and Google for engaging in unfair and deceptive practices by enabling the collection and sale of hundreds of millions of mobile phone users’ personal data”. That could be the case if they are ordered by a court to hand over certain types of data, like location information of users at an abortion clinic, search histories or text messages.Īccording to CNBC, before the decision, lawmakers called on Google and the Federal Trade Commission to ensure data for online consumers seeking care would be protected in the event of a landmark Roe v. People who need to call a clinic or healthcare provider should do it through a Google Voice phone number instead of their actual phone number.ĬNBC reported that tech companies may have to contend with issues about user privacy related to such health care whether they want to or not. They also recommend turning off browser’s abilities to remember browsing history and site data/cookies. They suggest browsers like Brave, Firefox, and DuckDuckGo on mobile.
Compartmentalizing it could make it harder to trace it back to you.ĮFF also recommends choosing a separate browser with hardened privacy settings. In it, EFF recommends that people should keep searches related to abortion separate from their daily lives. Wade on Friday, calls increased for tech companies to take a stand about the use of online data to incriminate individuals seeking or providing abortion services, The Guardian reported.Īccording to The Guardian, abortion and civil rights advocates have warned that there are few federal regulations on what information is collected and retained by tech firms, making it easy for law enforcement officials to access incriminating data on location, internet searchers and communication history.Įlectronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) posted “Digital Safety Tips: For People Seeking an Abortion”. Naughty nurse videos.After the US supreme court overturned Roe v.